|
THE NIV DECEPTION
I Timothy 3:16 Textus Receptus - kai omologoumenwV mega esti to thV eusebeiaV musthrion. QeoV efanerwqh en sarki, edikaiwqh en pneumati, wfqh aggeloiV, ekhrucqh en eqnesin, episteuqh en kosmw, anelhfqh en doxh. (And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory. - KJV) NA 21 - kai omologoumenwV mega estin to thV eusebeiaV musthrion. oV efanerwqh en sarki, edikaiwqh en pneumati, wfqh aggeloiV, ekhrucqh en eqnesin, episteuqh en kosmw, anelhmfqh en doxh. (Beyond all question, the mystery of godliness is great: He appeared in a body, was vindicated by the Spirit, was seen by angels, was preached among the nations, was believed on in the world, was taken up in glory. - NIV)
“The labours of Pamphilus and Eusebius in editing the Septuagint have already been spoken of. They "believed (as did St. Jerome nearly a century afterwards) that Origen had succeeded in restoring the old Greek version to its primitive purity". The result was a "mischievous mixture of the Alexandrian version with the versions of Aquila and Theodotion" (Swete, "Introd. to O. T. in Greek", pp. 77, 78).
Isaiah 14:12 How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!(KJV)
How you have fallen from heaven, O morning star, son of the dawn! You have been cast down to the earth, you who once laid low the nations!(NIV)
Notice that there is no star at all in the verse in the Hebrew Masoretic text, and it is not even found in the Septuagint. Why the NIV translators put O morning star, to prove that Lucifer is the Lord Jesus Christ when they compare Isaiah 14: 12 with Rev. 22: 16 I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star.
The purpose of the new translations is to put doubt in our minds in the original inspired text we have and to let us think that the original text dose not exist any more and what we have left is a text that have hundreds of different reading and now these liberal doctors are the ones that can decide for you what is the nearest reading to the original. But these doctors are sick themselves and doubt is their food day and night. They search and read all these liberal ideas to prove they are highly educated and they lead all the men of God astray.
In sitting under the feet of the Lord Jesus Christ He taught me the bible as he promised, “But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.” I John 2:27 The Lord Jesus Christ was reading the Masoretic text every Saturday, and he never one time said this passage here is wrong bring me the Dead Sea Scrolls to read the inspired text. He also never said this text is wrong here if we go to the Septuagint we will find the correct reading there. The church kept copying the Greek New Testament Bible faithfully to the extent that we have 2143 manuscripts called the Lectionaries manuscripts that are 100% exactly like the Textus Receptus. The 2741 Cursives manuscripts are 99% exactly like the Textus Receptus. Yes the Textus Receptus came from two manuscripts but now we have found that 2143 manuscripts are 100% exactly the same and this proves that these faithful Christians were very careful in copying the Holy Bible to the extent they made Westcott and Hort mad so that when they found manuscripts that support the Textus Receptus they said these are the same copy and our liberal pastors now they have the audacity to say these are a photocopy. Are we so ignorant and naïve that we do not know that photocopying is less then a hundred years old. |